ProFix data study - last reviewed 2026-06-21

Where are contractors scarce vs. abundant?

We divided every state's count of construction business establishments by its population to rank construction-market density per resident — U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) (2024) ÷ U.S. Census Bureau, Vintage 2024 Population Estimates (NST-EST2024-POP, resident population July 1, 2024). The twist a raw leaderboard hides: the densest construction markets are small states, not big ones. Read it as market structure (how many firms compete per household), not as a quality score.

Data as of Next data refresh: Q3 2026

By the ProFix Editorial Team — computed live from public BLS + Census data, fact-checked against the source seeds.

Computed live51 jurisdictionsBLS QCEW 2024Census 2024Per capitaPublished 2026-06-25

The headline numbers

Most dense (per capita)
Montana

700.4 establishments per 100,000 residents (7,965 establishments).

Least dense (per capita)
District of Columbia

193.2 per 100,000 residents (1,357 establishments).

National rate
275.9

Construction establishments per 100,000 U.S. residents across 51 jurisdictions.

Note how this differs from a raw count: California has the most construction establishments of any jurisdiction in absolute terms (93,997), but on a per-resident basis it ranks #42 of 51. Dividing by population is the entire point — it removes the "big states have more of everything" effect and shows where construction firms are genuinely dense relative to the households they serve.

What this measures — and what it does not

An establishment in BLS QCEW is a single physical business location classified into a construction NAICS industry — building (236), heavy and civil engineering (237), or specialty trade (238). It is a count of business locations, not a headcount of individual contractors or tradespeople: a contracting company that runs three offices counts as three establishments, and a one-person shop counts as one. It is also distinct from a state's licensed-contractor count and from ProFix's listing count. We say "contractors" in the headline the way a homeowner would — but the honest unit is the establishment, and we repeat that wherever a number appears.

Per-capita density is a market-structure signal, not a quality score or a measure of your odds of finding a good pro. A higher rate means more construction business locations per resident — a rough proxy for choice and competition. A lower rate often means the work is concentrated in fewer, larger, multi-site firms, or that the population simply grew faster than the firm count. Neither tells you whether any individual contractor is licensed, insured, bonded, or good. Those are separate signals ProFix tracks per contractor against official state licensing-board records — see how many contractors we can verify.

All 51 jurisdictions, ranked by establishments per 100k residents

Construction establishments (NAICS 236+237+238) per 100,000 residents, most dense first. Numerator: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) 2024. Denominator: U.S. Census Bureau, Vintage 2024 Population Estimates (NST-EST2024-POP, resident population July 1, 2024). Each state links to its ProFix directory hub. The national rate (275.9) is shown in the footer row as a benchmark.

U.S. construction establishments per 100,000 residents by state, BLS QCEW 2024 over Census 2024 population
RankStatePer 100kEstablishmentsPopulation
1Montana (MT)700.47,9651,137,233
2Idaho (ID)683.313,6782,001,619
3Wyoming (WY)5983,514587,618
4North Dakota (ND)494.13,936796,568
5South Dakota (SD)476.54,406924,669
6Vermont (VT)466.93,028648,493
7Maine (ME)461.16,4781,405,012
8Utah (UT)445.515,6093,503,613
9Oregon (OR)421.518,0094,272,371
10New Hampshire (NH)394.15,5531,409,032
11Nebraska (NE)378.87,5962,005,465
12Rhode Island (RI)368.34,0971,112,308
13Colorado (CO)364.321,7025,957,493
14Florida (FL)363.484,93723,372,215
15Delaware (DE)357.33,7591,051,917
16Alaska (AK)350.92,597740,133
17Washington (WA)346.527,5787,958,180
18North Carolina (NC)327.636,18611,046,024
19Minnesota (MN)317.718,4025,793,151
20Hawaii (HI)307.34,4441,446,146
21Massachusetts (MA)306.721,8907,136,171
22Iowa (IA)293.89,5243,241,488
23South Carolina (SC)288.315,7935,478,831
24Louisiana (LA)276.712,7244,597,740
25Oklahoma (OK)272.811,1744,095,393
26Missouri (MO)268.716,7846,245,466
27Arkansas (AR)2688,2763,088,354
28Wisconsin (WI)266.115,8645,960,975
29West Virginia (WV)265.74,7031,769,979
30Connecticut (CT)265.19,7423,675,069
31New York (NY)26552,64219,867,248
32Virginia (VA)261.723,0638,811,195
33Maryland (MD)261.416,3736,263,220
34Kentucky (KY)259.711,9174,588,372
35New Mexico (NM)259.75,5332,130,256
36Kansas (KS)258.57,6792,970,606
37Illinois (IL)257.232,69312,710,158
38Georgia (GA)249.627,91111,180,878
39Alabama (AL)245.612,6685,157,699
40Indiana (IN)243.816,8846,924,275
41Arizona (AZ)242.918,4167,582,384
42California (CA)238.493,99739,431,263
43Tennessee (TN)236.817,1127,227,750
44Pennsylvania (PA)234.230,62513,078,751
45New Jersey (NJ)233.822,2179,500,851
46Mississippi (MS)233.66,8752,943,045
47Michigan (MI)233.423,66410,140,459
48Ohio (OH)219.226,05111,883,304
49Texas (TX)205.464,26231,290,831
50Nevada (NV)201.86,5933,267,467
51District of Columbia (DC)193.21,357702,250
United States275.9938,480340,110,988

Why the small states top the list

The pattern is consistent and it is structural, not a quirk. The most establishment-dense states per resident — led by Montana at 700.4 per 100k — are low-population states with large rural footprints, where construction work is spread across many small, frequently single-location firms serving dispersed communities. The least-dense end — anchored by District of Columbia at 193.2 — tends to be high-population or fast-growing states where larger, multi-site firms absorb more of the work per location, or where the population has simply outpaced the establishment count. Read against the national benchmark of 275.9 per 100k, a state above the line is "firm-fragmented" and a state below it is "firm-concentrated" — both descriptive, neither good nor bad.

Methodology and honesty notes

  • Numerator. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), 2024 annual averages — private construction establishments in NAICS 236 (building), 237 (heavy/civil), and 238 (specialty trade). These are the BLS-published statewide totals (agglvl-55), not a re-sum of county rows, so they are immune to partial-county truncation. Public-domain U.S. government data (17 U.S.C. 105).
  • Denominator. U.S. Census Bureau, Vintage 2024 Population Estimates (NST-EST2024-POP, resident population July 1, 2024) — the resident population on July 1, 2024, embedded as a 51-row cited constant sourced to census.gov. This is the authoritative state-population source our earlier absolute-count study deliberately omitted for lack of a clean denominator.
  • The rate. Establishments ÷ population × 100,000, to one decimal. The national rate (275.9) is the BLS national establishment total over the summed jurisdiction population — a population-weighted mean, which is why it sits inside the per-state spread rather than at the average of the rows.
  • An establishment is a business location, not a contractor. A multi-site firm counts more than once; a sole proprietor counts once. This is not a licensed-individual headcount, not a state licensed-contractor count, and not a ProFix listing count.
  • Density is market structure, not quality. A higher per-capita rate means more firms competing per resident (more choice). It says nothing about whether any contractor is licensed, insured, or good — separate signals ProFix tracks per contractor.
  • Aggregate only. Both inputs are state totals. There is no contractor name, license number, phone, or address anywhere in this study — nothing that attributes anything to a named business.
  • Computed live. Every number is read from the committed BLS seed and divided by the embedded Census constant at render time. If the seed is rebuilt for a newer QCEW year, this page updates automatically — no value here is hardcoded.

Related ProFix research

This per-capita ranking is one of three distinct cuts of the same construction data. The companion studies answer different questions: one ranks states by absolute establishment count, one breaks down the trade mix among verifiable contractors, and the raw per-state counts ship as an open-data feed.

Frequently asked questions

Which state has the most construction establishments per capita?

Montana, with 700.4 construction establishments per 100,000 residents — 7,965 establishments across a population of 1,137,233 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) (2024) ÷ U.S. Census Bureau, Vintage 2024 Population Estimates (NST-EST2024-POP, resident population July 1, 2024)). The most-dense states are overwhelmingly low-population mountain and rural states, where work is split across many smaller, often single-location firms. An "establishment" is a business location, not an individual contractor, and a high per-capita rate is a market-structure fact — more firms per household — not a measure of contractor quality or your odds of finding a good one.

Which state has the fewest construction establishments per capita?

District of Columbia, at 193.2 per 100,000 residents — 1,357 establishments against 702,250 people. A low rate does NOT mean a state is short of good contractors: it often means the work is concentrated in larger, multi-site firms (each location still counts once), or that population grew faster than the establishment count. The national rate is 275.9 per 100k, so you can read any state against that benchmark.

Is a higher density better — does it mean I'll find a better contractor?

No. This is the single most important caveat. Establishments per capita describes market STRUCTURE — how many construction business locations exist per resident — which is a rough proxy for competition and choice, not quality. A denser market may mean more firms bidding for the same job; a sparser one may mean a few larger firms do most of the work. Neither says anything about whether any individual contractor is licensed, insured, or good. ProFix tracks those signals separately, per contractor, against official state licensing-board records.

Why doesn't the biggest state by raw count top this ranking?

Because per-capita and raw-count answer different questions. California has the most construction establishments in absolute terms (93,997), simply because it has the most people — but on a per-resident basis it ranks #42 of 51, while Montana leads. Normalizing by population strips out the "big states have more of everything" effect and shows where construction firms are actually dense relative to the households they serve. Our companion study ranks the same trades by ABSOLUTE establishment count if you want the raw leaderboard.

What exactly is being counted, and where does the data come from?

The numerator is U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) 2024 annual-average counts of private construction establishments — business locations in construction NAICS 236 (building), 237 (heavy/civil), and 238 (specialty trade). These are the BLS statewide totals, immune to partial-county truncation. The denominator is U.S. Census Bureau, Vintage 2024 Population Estimates (NST-EST2024-POP, resident population July 1, 2024) — the resident population on July 1, 2024. Both are public data (BLS is public domain under 17 U.S.C. 105; Census estimates are public). Every rate is establishments ÷ population × 100,000, computed at render time from a committed seed — never hardcoded — and the whole study is aggregate only, with no per-contractor row anywhere.

Emergency